A lot has been made about Coach Carroll's lone dissenting vote at the Pac-10 coaches meetings regarding the proposal to allow children under 18 on the sidelines at games.
But a closer look shows that this is a big fuss about nothing. Get the facts about the rule and proposed change in this well researched L.A. Times piece, which includes mention of the conference's athletic directors shooting the proposal down by an 8-2 count and existing verbiage in the sideline rule that already allows for coaches' kids on the sidelines as water boys or something similar: "no person under the age of 18 shall be allowed on the sideline or in the team area during the game unless he or she is performing an assigned game-related task."
Read the full L.A. Times entry here.
But a closer look shows that this is a big fuss about nothing. Get the facts about the rule and proposed change in this well researched L.A. Times piece, which includes mention of the conference's athletic directors shooting the proposal down by an 8-2 count and existing verbiage in the sideline rule that already allows for coaches' kids on the sidelines as water boys or something similar: "no person under the age of 18 shall be allowed on the sideline or in the team area during the game unless he or she is performing an assigned game-related task."
Read the full L.A. Times entry here.
Leave a comment